In global life sciences organizations, training is not just about transfer of knowledge but about driving real-world behavior change that advances business goals. Most L&D leaders are familiar with measurement frameworks like Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation (reaction, learning, behavior, results) and the idea that the training should be measured for satisfaction, knowledge transfer, behavior change, and return on investment (ROI).
But the challenge is that we work in a fast-paced, highly regulated world. Knowing that measurement matters and actually implementing a measurement plan are two different things.
Why it’s hard to “prove” L&D effectiveness in life sciences
Life sciences organizations face unique barriers that make measurement more complex than in other industries. For example:
Data silos & fragmented systems – Information on training, field activity, and business outcomes often live in separate tools with limited integration.
Lagging metrics – Sales results or HCP adoption may take months (or years) to show up, making it difficult to connect directly to a learning intervention.
Misleading indicators – Product knowledge scores don’t always translate to field effectiveness, scientific influence, or better patient outcomes.
Cultural resistance – Some roles, like Medical Science Liaisons (MSLs), may resist measurement due to concerns it will oversimplify their nuanced, relationship-driven work.
Market variability – Regional differences in regulations, payer systems, and patient populations make global benchmarking difficult.
For example, in Commercial teams, relying solely on sales numbers can be misleading as performance might be driven by territory dynamics rather than training. For Medical Affairs, metrics like “number of visits” or “congress engagements” don’t reflect the depth or strategic value of interactions with healthcare providers (HCPs).
The result? Teams are often left with partial stories that don’t fully demonstrate the value of learning initiatives or pinpoint where weaknesses and gaps still exist. Without this clarity, it’s harder to target interventions, allocate resources effectively, or make the case for future investments.
Our approach to measurement
Our approach builds on established frameworks like Kirkpatrick. We believe that measurement must go deeper and be more strategic to unlock the value of training.
Why? Because behavior change is the bridge between learning and business impact.
We work with you to identify a tailored set of KPIs that reflect the specific roles, markets, and business goals relevant to your team. We focus on both leading indicators (early signs of progress) and lagging indicators (longer-term outcomes) and tie them to business goals from the start of the program.
How to measure beyond knowledge
It is important to capture both quantitative and qualitative metrics through innovative and practical tools:
Confidence trackers – Deployed before and after training to measure self-reported confidence in applying skills and messages.
Competency-based rubrics – Defining clear skill expectations and scoring against them in roleplays, field coaching, or other interactions.
AI-powered simulations – Providing scenario-based practice that allows for consistent, scalable performance evaluation.
Coaching insights – Leveraging CRM notes, follow-up actions, manager feedback, and ridealongs to spot patterns in conversation quality and real-world impact.
Attitudinal surveys – Assessing HCP perceptions or behavior shifts tied to field team or Medical Affairs engagement.
These approaches allow us to assess not just “what they know,” but “what they do differently” as a result of training.
Best practices for sustainable measurement
Measurement is most effective when it’s not an afterthought but a built-in component of program design:
Define KPIs early – Identify a manageable set of metrics aligned to learning and business goals.
Show the relationship – Connect the dots from learning and education → KPIs → business success, blending qualitative feedback, behavioral observation, and business metrics to tell a complete, compelling data story.
Establish a tracking cadence – Monitor regularly to see progress, not just at the end, and course-correct along the way.
Tie to a competency model – Create a common language for what success looks like and make field teams accountable and actively involved in their development and measurement.
Be ready to adapt – If the data shows the approach isn’t driving the desired change, adjust quickly. This works best with real-time tracking.
Powered by OCTANE
Proving the value of training is not just about satisfying leadership but ensuring your teams are equipped to confidently influence HCP beliefs/behaviors, adoption of therapies or products, patient care, and KOL engagement.
When done right, measurement becomes a strategic tool for identifying strengths, addressing weaknesses, and making learning a driver of business impact.
At OCTANE, we partner with global life sciences teams to design measurement strategies that work in the real world turning learning into measurable behavior change and measurable change into business results.
